Technology

Should Australia establish an independent body to investigate scientific misconduct? We asked 5 experts

2025-12-12 00:12
775 views
Should Australia establish an independent body to investigate scientific misconduct? We asked 5 experts

Scientific misconduct can waste public funds and harm human health. But views differ about the best way to tackle it.

  • Home

Edition

Africa Australia Brasil Canada Canada (français) España Europe France Global Indonesia New Zealand United Kingdom United States The Conversation Edition: Global
  • Africa
  • Australia
  • Brasil
  • Canada
  • Canada (français)
  • España
  • Europe
  • France
  • Indonesia
  • New Zealand
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
s Newsletters The Conversation Academic rigour, journalistic flair A row of test tubes in front of a silhouetted person. National Cancer Institute Should Australia establish an independent body to investigate scientific misconduct? We asked 5 experts Published: December 12, 2025 12.12am GMT Drew Rooke, The Conversation, Ben W. Mol, Dane McCamey, Jason Chin, Jennifer Byrne, Nicholas M Fisk

Author

Interviewed

Partners

View all partners

DOI

https://doi.org/10.64628/AA.mccr5nnkm

https://theconversation.com/should-australia-establish-an-independent-body-to-investigate-scientific-misconduct-we-asked-5-experts-270460 https://theconversation.com/should-australia-establish-an-independent-body-to-investigate-scientific-misconduct-we-asked-5-experts-270460 Link copied Share article

Share article

Copy link Email Bluesky Facebook WhatsApp Messenger LinkedIn X (Twitter)

Print article

Most of us trust scientists. We believe they are not just competent, but honest as well.

This belief is well-founded. However, scientists are also human – and sometimes they can make mistakes. These mistakes can be accidental. But they can also be intentional, as the rising number of academic papers retracted on the grounds of scientific misconduct demonstrates.

Scientific misconduct – which includes data fabrication, falsification and misrepresentation, and is being fuelled by artificial intelligence – isn’t merely an academic problem. Medical studies based on misleading or falsified data, for example, can harm human health. In extreme cases, scientific misconduct can also prove fatal.

Different countries have different approaches to tackling this problem. Sweden and Denmark are often lauded as “world-leaders” for establishing independent bodies that have the power to investigate allegations of scientific misconduct.

Australia has no such body. It instead relies on a self-regulation model, whereby universities assess and investigate scientific misconduct cases involving their staff internally.

Should Australia follow the approach of its international peers and establish an independent body that has the power to investigate scientific misconduct cases? We asked five experts. Three answered yes. Even the two who answered no said Australia could do more to protect research integrity.

Disclosure statements

Jason Chin is a board member of the Association for Interdisciplinary Metaresearch and Open Science (AIMOS), a charity that seeks to study and improve science.

Dane McCamey is involved in overseeing research ethics and compliance at UNSW.

Jennifer Byrne receives funding from the NHMRC. She is the current recipient of the Professor David Vaux Research Integrity Fellowship (2025–2026) offered by the Australian Academy of Science. She is also a Research Integrity Advisor at the University of Sydney.

Ben W. Mol receives funding from NHMRC, MRFF, as well as international competitive grants.

Nicholas Fisk served as Dean Medicine and Health at the University of Queensland (2010-16) and DVC Research and Enterprise at UNSW (2016–24). He is a board member of the peak body Research Australia.

  • Academia
  • Research integrity
  • Retractions
  • 5 experts
  • Scientific misconduct

Events

More events

Jobs

More jobs
  • Editorial Policies
  • Community standards
  • Republishing guidelines
  • Analytics
  • Our feeds
  • Get newsletter
  • Who we are
  • Our charter
  • Our team
  • Partners and funders
  • Resource for media
  • Contact us
Privacy policy Terms and conditions Corrections